Iran's new commanders run the war from hiding. Even Tehran doesn't always know where they are.

The Islamic Republic's third command generation in a year lives by courier, bunker and pre-delegated orders. The fragments that reach the public sketch the shape of those hidden lives.

By the Middle East Desk · June 2026 · 12 min read

The Islamic Republic's third command generation in a year lives by courier, bunker and pre-delegated orders. The fragments that reach the public sketch the shape of those lives.

Iran's General Staff of the Armed Forces, the highest military body in the country, has no publicly named chief. Its last two holders, Mohammad Bagheri and Abdolrahim Mousavi, were killed nine months apart, Bagheri in Israel's opening strikes of June 2025 and Mousavi in the February 28 opening strikes that also killed Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei.[1] Since then, the position has simply not been announced. The same is true of the Revolutionary Guard Navy, whose commander Alireza Tangsiri died of wounds after a March strike in Bandar Abbas; no successor has been named in public.[7] After losing two army chiefs and two IRGC commanders-in-chief in under a year, the Islamic Republic appears to have concluded that announcing who holds a job is the first step toward burying him.

Iran's wartime leadership in June 2026 is organized, above all, around not being found. What follows is what the public record establishes about who these men are, where they are believed to live, and what their days have become, together with a plain accounting of where that record goes dark.

The men, where they can be named

The IRGC's commander-in-chief is Ahmad Vahidi, appointed March 1, a day after his predecessor Mohammad Pakpour was killed at a Defense Council meeting, eight months into the job. Pakpour had himself replaced Hossein Salami, killed in June 2025. Vahidi is a founding-generation figure who reportedly ran the Quds Force from 1988 to 1997, before Qassem Soleimani, and later served as defense and interior minister. He remains under an Interpol red notice at Argentina's request over the 1994 AMIA bombing in Buenos Aires, which killed 85 people; Iran calls the accusation baseless.[2][3] "The man is brutal," the Amwaj.media editor Mohammad Ali Shabani said when the appointment was announced. "Hardliners wasting no time filling vacancies thanks to Israel."[2]

Vahidi's significance for this story is his style. Iranian media describe a man "not often seen in public" who works behind the scenes, the temperamental opposite of Soleimani's battlefield celebrity; when images circulated in March showing him meeting Pakistan's interior minister, Iranian outlets themselves debunked them as a 2024 file photo.[3] In early June, opposition accounts and social media circulated claims that he had been killed in a strike on an underground facility in northwest Tehran. As of this writing, no official source on either side has confirmed it, and the claims should be treated as rumor.[21] That such a rumor can persist for days without resolution is itself a measure of how invisible the man at the top of the IRGC has become.

Below the commander-in-chief, the picture loses definition quickly. The war command, Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters, is on its third chief in fifteen months: Gholam Ali Rashid was killed in June 2025, his successor Ali Shadmani lasted four days, and Ali Abdollahi Aliabadi was appointed in September.[8] The Aerospace Force, the missile arm, is a genuine open question. The June 2025 appointment records name Majid Mousavi as commander; casualty lists circulating since the spring name a different officer, Mehdi Qureishi, as the Aerospace commander killed in Isfahan on March 20; and Iran International reported in late March that Mousavi was alive but under internal IRGC criticism for "being absent during ongoing clashes and leaving his forces without leadership."[5][6] These accounts cannot all be true, and this publication will not pretend to resolve them. The honest statement is that outside observers do not reliably know who commands Iran's missile force.

Then there is Esmail Qaani, the Quds Force commander, who has vanished from public view amid unverified claims, never confirmed by any major outlet, that he was detained or worse on suspicion of compromised security. Qaani has been declared dead or arrested at least twice before, in October 2024 and June 2025, and resurfaced both times, once appearing at a Tehran celebration in civilian clothes and a baseball cap.[4] That image, a general doing proof-of-life in street dress, is as close as the record comes to showing how Iran's commanders now move through their own capital.

The courier labyrinth

The most detailed reporting on any Iranian leader's current living arrangements concerns the new Supreme Leader, Mojtaba Khamenei, and it comes principally from American officials speaking to CBS News in late May. By that account, Mojtaba is reachable only through a "labyrinth" of couriers; even senior Iranian officials do not know his location and have no direct line to him. "Every piece of information he receives is dated, and there's a lot of latency," one U.S. official said. Iranian leaders more broadly were described as spending weeks at a time in fortified bunkers. "Watching them try to figure out how to talk to each other is almost like watching a sitcom," the official said.[10]

The latency is not an abstraction; American officials say the courier chain has materially slowed ceasefire diplomacy, because positions relayed to the man who must approve them return days stale. U.S. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard testified in March that Mojtaba had been "very seriously injured" in the strike that killed his father and that Iranian decision-making "is not clear."[1] Reports from sources described as close to his inner circle later claimed he remained mentally sharp and joined meetings by audio link; the Soufan Center noted in the same period that no regime figure claimed personal contact with him and that no audio or video of him had ever been released. Both claims sit in the record, weeks apart, and they do not fully agree.[1][10]

The silence around him, at least, is well documented. Mojtaba has never been seen or heard in public since taking office on March 8. His first statement to the nation, two weeks into the war, was a written text read by a state-television anchor over a still photograph. "Certainly the lever of blocking the Strait of Hormuz must continue to be used," the anchor read, and, on the war dead: "We will not ignore revenge for the blood of your martyrs."[17] His father's state funeral was postponed repeatedly over security fears, after explicit Israeli threats against the successor, and was finally dispersed across ceremonies in three cities in early June.[18][19] The contrast with June 2025, when hundreds of thousands filled Tehran's streets for Salami, Bagheri and Hajizadeh, is the visible arc of the change: in one year, the Islamic Republic went from burying its commanders as public spectacle to burying its Supreme Leader furtively, in pieces, behind a screen of postponements.[20]

Two further fragments fill in the picture, each requiring its label. Iran International, analyzing imagery released by the Israeli military, mapped a roughly five-kilometer tunnel network under Tehran's Pasteur district, its central installation 40 to 50 meters down, with entrances sited near a working medical clinic, a parking structure and two elementary schools; the analysis put construction costs at $150 million or more. It is a single outlet's reading of an adversary's released imagery, and should be weighed as such.[12] And Ali Safavi of the opposition-affiliated National Council of Resistance of Iran told Fox News that Mojtaba's protection passed to the NOPO, a six-brigade praetorian unit founded in 1991: "They are far more lethal, ruthless and well-trained than the IRGC."[11] Opposition sourcing carries its own agenda; the existence and role of the unit, though, is consistent with the regime's known architecture.

The most telling detail in the entire record may be the smallest. According to Axios, U.S. and Israeli intelligence concluded in March that Mojtaba was alive partly from evidence that Iranian officials were trying, and failing, to schedule in-person meetings with him for security reasons.[13] The proof of life was the bureaucratic frustration of his own government.

What a day looks like

No journalist has followed an IRGC commander through a working day, and the article you are reading will not invent one. But the reported fragments assemble into a recognizable shape.

The day begins and ends without a phone. After June 2025, Iran's Intelligence Ministry banned senior officials and commanders from using phones and connected devices, and the New York Times reported, citing three Iranian officials familiar with the emergency war plans, that Ali Khamenei in his final months suspended electronic communication entirely, ran the war through a single trusted aide from a bunker, and pre-named replacement commanders down the chain together with three candidate successors to himself.[9] That playbook, written by the father, is the one the son's government now runs at scale.

Command travels by pre-delegation rather than wire. In March, the deputy defense minister Reza Talaeinik described the doctrine publicly: "The role of each unit and section has been organized in such a way that if any commander is killed, a successor immediately takes their place." Each commander reportedly names successors three ranks deep. Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi described retaliatory units "operating based on general instructions given to them in advance, rather than direct, real-time command." Kasra Aarabi of United Against Nuclear Iran, who studies the IRGC, summarized the intent: "The whole idea was to decentralize so that if one particular province came under attack, it could defend itself."[14] A commander's day under this doctrine involves, by design, very little commanding. The orders were issued in advance; his function is to exist, dispersed, as proof the system continues.

And the day is spent scanning the room. The war has driven espionage executions to record levels: a former Atomic Energy Organization employee executed in April for allegedly passing building locations and staff identities to Israel; two men executed the same month after being recruited online and, prosecutors said, trained by Mossad officers in Iraqi Kurdistan; another in May called an operational ringleader.[15] Iranian authorities have said more than 700 people were detained on collaboration suspicions after the June 2025 war, and rights monitors counted at least 1,500 arrests in the first month of this one.[16] Every one of those cases tightens the circle around the men in the bunkers: fewer aides, fewer meetings, fewer people who know.

The precedents

Iran's commanders are not the first hunted leadership to live this way, and the prior cases, offered here strictly as precedent rather than reporting on Iran, suggest where the pressure points lie.

Osama bin Laden's Abbottabad compound had no phone line and no internet. He wrote constantly; couriers carried his correspondence on flash drives to distant internet cafés. He never left the property, pacing the garden so regularly that satellite analysts nicknamed him "The Pacer." The system preserved him for years, and then it found him: the CIA identified his courier, Abu Ahmed al-Kuwaiti, and followed the courier's white Suzuki home.[22][23] The courier labyrinth American officials now describe around Mojtaba Khamenei is, structurally, the system that located bin Laden.

Hassan Nasrallah lived eighteen years underground after 2006, appearing almost exclusively by video link, and died in September 2024 at the one node bunker discipline cannot eliminate: an in-person leadership meeting, deep under Beirut's Dahiyeh, in a strike of extraordinary weight.[24] Iran's February 28 losses followed the same grammar; Pakpour, Mousavi and the defense minister died together, at a meeting. Yahya Sinwar survived a year in Gaza's tunnels through a manhunt of historic intensity, then was killed above ground by a routine patrol in a chance encounter.[25] Saddam Hussein rotated among palaces and let a myth of body doubles stand because, as his American interrogators later concluded, the myth itself "added to his safety"; he lasted eight months on the run after his state fell, and was given up, in the end, by his own bodyguard network.[26][27]

The pattern across all four is consistent. Bunkers and silence defeat the routine threat. What kills hidden leaders is the residue of ordinary life, the meeting that must be held, the courier who must travel, the trusted circle that must exist. Iran's new command generation has organized itself to minimize exactly that residue, and the cost is the latency, the sitcom, the government that cannot schedule a meeting with its own head of state.

What is not known

The gaps in the record deserve to be catalogued as carefully as its contents. No open source reports where Ahmad Vahidi or any serving IRGC commander sleeps, whether they rotate locations, how their guards are vetted, or what contact they keep with their families. The body-double question is rumor. The Navy and General Staff successions are unannounced. The Aerospace command is contested across irreconcilable accounts. Whether Esmail Qaani commands anything is unknowable from the outside. Nearly everything in the record arrives through four channels, American intelligence leaking to American media, Israeli-released imagery, anonymous Iranian officials, and opposition-linked outlets, each with interests of its own.

What the record does establish is the shape of the thing. A state that a year ago gave its dead generals the largest funerals in its history now declines to say who its living ones are. Omid Memarian of DAWN observed in April that the absence of the elder Khamenei, "the figure who traditionally settled major disputes, has exposed internal divisions that were previously contained."[28] The divisions are managed, for now, by distance: a leadership that cannot be assassinated together because it is never together, ruling a war through orders written in advance, read by anchors, and carried by men on errands whose routes are the most closely held secret in Iran.

Open in the interactive site →